What is a Suspicious Transaction Report (STR)?

Financial crimes, including money laundering, fraud, and terrorist financing, are some of the most significant risks to financial systems worldwide. To combat these crimes, people use Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs), as seen in this visual.

Suspicious Transaction Report helps governments freeze and investigate potentially unlawful transactions. Banks and other financial institutions must file STRs under the AML guidelines of virtually every country.

Table of Contents

What is a Suspicious Transaction Report?

The abbreviation STR stands for the Suspicious Transaction Report. It is a documented report made by financial institutions to the suspicious activity reporting authority like the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) in the United States when the financial institution identifies suspicious transactions or activities. Such positions are necessary if the company follows anti-money laundering guidelines like STRs.

STRs differ from regular transaction reports filed by reporting institutions in that they filter out transactions that are out of the ordinary or have unclear sources of funds. These reports are helpful to the regulatory authorities in following, investigating, and fighting financial crimes as they receive leads from them.

In particular, since 2012, any STRs filed in the United States must go through the BSA e-filing system of FinCEN. These reports detail people’s participation, the use of such financial tools, the places and times of occurrence, and the reasons for identifying the activity as suspicious.

Why Are Suspicious Transaction Reports Important?

Banks and other regulatory industries are usually the first to notice shifts in financial transaction activities. By submitting STRs, these institutions play a crucial role in preventing the abuse of financial services.

The legislation allows STRs to provide related authorities with important information, such as the details of the transaction, the parties involved in the suspicious activity, and the context of the entire scenario. This information is further helpful in constructing detailed intelligence repositories that make detecting and dismantling criminal activities easier.

However, the use of STRs is not limited to specific cases. In addition, the information compiled from PLTO reports can reveal significant trends in unlawful conduct, including typologies for money laundering and other trends and weaknesses in the monetary system. STRs, therefore, provide policies and regulators with greater insight to help prevent future occurrences and improve AML or CTF.

As the world continues to globalization, these financial crimes interconnect across the globe, meaning STRs are critical to the world’s safety. By presenting details on transparency and accountability, these reports play a key role in preserving the credibility of the banking sector and the financial system.

What Qualifies as a Suspicious Transaction?

A transaction is considered suspicious if it differs from consumers’ behavior or looks like financial fraud. Even though they are not illicit, SSTs require further supervision because of their peculiarity or environment.

Whenever a transaction does not fit within a customer’s financial capability, it is considered dubious. For instance, if a holder of a low-income account is putting down large sums of money and fails to explain the source of the money, then this might be a sign of money laundering. Frequent transactions in such areas as countries with poor AML policies might also be an issue, resulting in increased risk.

To avoid detection, participants scatter humongous transactions into small ones. One typical structure example is where individuals deposit amounts far below the $10,000 US reporting limit. Other red flags include mediator transactions with no apparent business, small cross-border transfers, and high activity after long periods of no activity.

Other examples of non-emotional suspicious activity include clients’ failure to provide identification or producing conflicting information. These behaviors should be assessed alongside other transactional data within the financial institutions to identify whether the establishment meets the required STR filing criteria.

What constitutes a suspicious transaction also varies with the automated monitoring system, employee vigilance and fake updates, and the anti-money laundering legislation and standards.

How is a Suspicious Transaction Report Filed?

Filing a Suspicious Transaction Report by financial institutions and other reporting entities is an organized process of communicating to regulatory authorities about possible illicit actions.

During a routine review, a mid-size financial institution’s compliance team identified a corporate client conducting frequent cross-border transactions without a clear business purpose. The compliance officer prepared a Suspicious Transaction Report detailing the customer’s profile, transaction patterns, and supporting documents.

The detailed narrative helped regulators identify links to a larger international smuggling operation, showcasing the importance of meticulous reporting in STR filing.

In different jurisdictions, actual procedures for filing an STR may be unique, but there are similar steps in preparing an STR. Here’s a general overview of the filing process:

1. Detect Suspicious Activity

Financial institutions monitor transactions for suspicious activities using automated systems or employee observations.
Red flags are unusual account activity, large unexplained transactions, or behaviors such as structuring to avoid reporting thresholds.

2. Review the Activity

The institution gathers transaction information, customer records, and other supporting documents.
The activity is analyzed for context, such as whether it fits the customer’s profile or business operations.

3. Escalate Internally

The case is escalated to the compliance team or the MLRO if the suspicion persists.
This team determines whether the activity is suspicious enough to file an STR.

4. Prepare the STR

The Suspicious Transaction Report includes:

Transaction details (amount, date, type, etc.)
Customer information (names, IDs, account numbers)
Reasons for suspicion (a narrative of red flags or unusual behavior)
Supporting evidence (account statements or logs).

5. Submit the STR

The final STR is filed with the jurisdiction’s FIU, such as FinCEN or STRO.
Submission is usually made using electronic systems such as BSA e-filing or goAML.

6. File Within Timelines

Most jurisdictions require the filing of STRs within 30 calendar days after the suspicious activity has been detected.
If no suspect is identified, more time can be granted to collect information.

7. Post-Filing Steps

Keep Records: Keep a copy of the STR and other relevant papers for at least five years.
Respond to Authorities: Be prepared to provide additional information to authorities if required.
Maintain Confidentiality: Do not share the STR filing with the customer or third parties.

8. Ongoing Monitoring

Monitor the customer’s transactions for further suspicious activities.
Submit further STRs if you have new concerns.

What Information is Included in an STR?

A Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) contains detailed information that gives financial intelligence units (FIUs) insights into potentially illicit activities. The following components are usually included in an STR:

1. Customer Information:

Full name, address, contact details, and identification numbers.
Information on any associated accounts or beneficial owners.

2. Transaction Details:

Type of transaction (e.g., deposits, wire transfers, or withdrawals).
Amount, currency, and date of the transaction.
Account numbers and locations where the transactions occurred.

3. Reason for Suspicion:

A narrative describing why the activity is suspicious.
Observations that include structuring, unusual patterns of transactions, or involvement in high-risk jurisdictions.

4. Supporting Documentation:

Account statements, transaction history, identification records, logs, or records that substantiate the report.

5. Institution Details:

Name, address, and contact particulars of the reporting entity.
Identification number of the reporting officer filing the report.

How STRs are Used by Authorities?

Once a Suspicious Transaction Report is submitted, authorities leverage it to detect, prevent, and prosecute financial crimes. Here’s how STRs are utilized:

Data Analysis: FIUs analyze STRs using advanced analytical tools to identify patterns, trends, and connections between individuals or entities involved in suspicious activities.
Building Investigations: STRs are the foundation for investigations into money laundering, terrorist financing, fraud, and other crimes. They provide leads that guide enforcement agencies toward uncovering illicit networks.
Collaboration Across Agencies: FIUs share relevant STR data with law enforcement agencies, tax authorities, and international bodies like the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to combat cross-border crimes.
Proactive Risk Management: STRs help authorities monitor emerging risks in financial systems, allowing regulators to strengthen policies and address vulnerabilities proactively.

Challenges and Best Practices in Filing STRs

Filing STRs effectively requires overcoming common challenges while adhering to best practices.

Challenges:

Subjectivity in Suspicion: Determining what qualifies as suspicious can vary among employees, leading to inconsistent reporting. A compliance officer noted frequent small wire transfers to a high-risk jurisdiction. Investigation revealed the client was unknowingly involved in a fraud scheme.
High Volumes: Large financial institutions often face overwhelming volumes of transactions to monitor, increasing the risk of missing red flags.
Lack of Training: Insufficient employee training may result in over-reporting or under-reporting suspicious activities.
Data Accuracy: Errors in customer information or transaction details can undermine the quality of STRs.
Timeliness: Delayed reporting may hinder investigations and allow criminal activity to persist.

Best Practices:

Clear Internal Policies: Develop detailed policies that outline criteria for identifying suspicious activities and the steps for filing STRs.
Employee Training: Regular training sessions ensure employees can recognize red flags and understand their role in the STR process.
Automated Monitoring Tools: Use advanced transaction monitoring systems to detect anomalies efficiently and reduce manual errors.
Robust Documentation: Maintain thorough records to support the rationale for filing suspicious transaction reports and comply with regulatory audits.
Regular Audits: Review and update Suspicious Transaction Report procedures to address evolving risks and ensure compliance.

Conclusion

Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) are essential tools in the fight against financial crime. Compliance professionals can improve financial integrity by following best practices for investigations and leveraging tools like KYC Hub to enhance project efficiency and quality. STRs not only ensure compliance but also act as societal safeguards, supporting the stability of financial markets.